<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ITN &amp; The Problem With Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/</link>
	<description>Black, White, Grey. Whatever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darius Money</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=815#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Great post by the way... From my experience the whole duplicate content penalty is a myth... Reason: I have a niche blog that is built off of duplicate content.. It ranks number 7  for the keyword &quot;digital cameras under $100&quot;. Its all about giving your site authority, and building quality back links.. So if you have a authority site that has duplicate content you won&#039;t be penalized... If you throw some duplicate content on a spammy made for ad sense blog, than im pretty sure google will penalize you... not because of the duplicate content, but because your site is garbage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post by the way&#8230; From my experience the whole duplicate content penalty is a myth&#8230; Reason: I have a niche blog that is built off of duplicate content.. It ranks number 7  for the keyword &#8220;digital cameras under $100&#8243;. Its all about giving your site authority, and building quality back links.. So if you have a authority site that has duplicate content you won&#8217;t be penalized&#8230; If you throw some duplicate content on a spammy made for ad sense blog, than im pretty sure google will penalize you&#8230; not because of the duplicate content, but because your site is garbage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=815#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Andy. Not sure I follow though - I don&#039;t really advocate scraping other people&#039;s content. 

I also don&#039;t think your method would work there - surely the site owner would see you&#039;ve taken their content? (If they follow your link, they&#039;ll still wind up at the same content after the 301). Also the vast majority of blog comments are generally nofollow - so Google won&#039;t treat the copied content that&#039;s nofollow linked to as the original. I would guess, anyway, because otherwise scrapers that use trackbacks would be causing a ton of damage to the SERPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Andy. Not sure I follow though &#8211; I don&#8217;t really advocate scraping other people&#8217;s content. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think your method would work there &#8211; surely the site owner would see you&#8217;ve taken their content? (If they follow your link, they&#8217;ll still wind up at the same content after the 301). Also the vast majority of blog comments are generally nofollow &#8211; so Google won&#8217;t treat the copied content that&#8217;s nofollow linked to as the original. I would guess, anyway, because otherwise scrapers that use trackbacks would be causing a ton of damage to the SERPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=815#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post. Here&#039;s an idea:

Modify an autoblog script so that when it copies articles from blogs, it also comments on the page that it stole from. Have the URL in the comment go to a different page on your site that you 301 to the page with the content. That way, google ranks you, not them. More simple:

*BlogA publishes article at BlogA.tld/article.
*Script (for your autoblog) scrapes article from BlogA and posts it to BlogB.tld/article
*Script comments on BlogA.tld/article with a link to BlogB.tld/article301
*BlogB.tld/article301 is a 301 redir to BlogB.tld/article. This gives you the link juice in google&#039;s eyes, plus the owner of BlogA is unlikely to notice that you copied their article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post. Here&#8217;s an idea:</p>
<p>Modify an autoblog script so that when it copies articles from blogs, it also comments on the page that it stole from. Have the URL in the comment go to a different page on your site that you 301 to the page with the content. That way, google ranks you, not them. More simple:</p>
<p>*BlogA publishes article at BlogA.tld/article.<br />
*Script (for your autoblog) scrapes article from BlogA and posts it to BlogB.tld/article<br />
*Script comments on BlogA.tld/article with a link to BlogB.tld/article301<br />
*BlogB.tld/article301 is a 301 redir to BlogB.tld/article. This gives you the link juice in google&#8217;s eyes, plus the owner of BlogA is unlikely to notice that you copied their article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/itn-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=815#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  Found it very interesting, I often find myself falling into the mindset of penalties rather than filters.  When you change the way you think about such things it tends to open a lot of possibilities or feelings of freedom... Matrix moment: There is no spoon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  Found it very interesting, I often find myself falling into the mindset of penalties rather than filters.  When you change the way you think about such things it tends to open a lot of possibilities or feelings of freedom&#8230; Matrix moment: There is no spoon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
