<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Bing Rely Too Heavily On Backlinks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharkseo.com/nohat/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/bing/</link>
	<description>Black, White, Grey. Whatever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=338#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>Yup I have also came across this.  It is a little strange but as we all know all search engines work on there algorithms constantly. I think its best to just get as many backlinks as you can, its very hard to prove or disprove these kind of assumptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup I have also came across this.  It is a little strange but as we all know all search engines work on there algorithms constantly. I think its best to just get as many backlinks as you can, its very hard to prove or disprove these kind of assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/nohat/bing/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=338#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Yup. Seen this too, as you well know. Although in our case, we have never done the SEO for the random result we are getting, nor are there any links, that I can find, between the two domains. Bloody weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. Seen this too, as you well know. Although in our case, we have never done the SEO for the random result we are getting, nor are there any links, that I can find, between the two domains. Bloody weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.456 seconds -->
