16 Jul 2010, Posted by admin in Nohat, 6 Comments
303 Redirects & SEO
303 redirects are never really talked about in the SEO community, and in truth it’s for good reason.
According to w3.org, 303s basically mean “see other”. The redirecting URL shouldn’t be cached and it generally indicates that the content is held elsewhere. Importantly though, it says this:
“Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand the 303 status”.
SEOs generally know to use a 301 for the vast majority of redirects, but if you ever get a web dev or a design team that wants to use a 303, there’s now a good example of why it should be avoided here:

A search for “Wimbledon” in Google currently shows a blank .com also ranking, just as a 302 often would. This implies that a 303 redirect won’t pass on link value to the main site, like a 301 would, and can cause the redirecting URL to also be listed in the SERPs.
For some reason, the Wimbledon.com URL 301 redirects most users to the correct Wimbledon.org domain, but will show search engines a 303. You can switch your user agent to Googlebot and check.
Yahoo and Bing treat 303s the same way:

Yahoo also doesn’t appear to see the .com redirect properly. And neither does Bing:

So, in summary – 303 redirects don’t appear to work properly to search engines. If you want your permanent redirects to be counted by the search engines, avoid them and use 301 redirect instead.


6 Comments
July 16, 2010 10:23 am
richardbaxterseo @richardbaxter
Yes Dave – I love this kind of thing. Keep it up!
July 16, 2010 10:43 am
Sander Tamaela @CrashOne
Nice article!
But (concerning your example) if I was in control of the wimbledon.com domain, I would keep the 303 in place (the 3 top spots are nice to occupy) until I need the link value of the .com domain.
July 16, 2010 10:52 am
rob hammond @robhammond
Good post but am I missing something? wimbledon.com serves (boom boom) a 301 for me
July 16, 2010 12:16 pm
Scott McLay @@Scott_Mclay
Good overview of the 303 redirect, I have seen this before in the past, but it took me a while to actualy find the cause as i was looking for a 302
July 16, 2010 3:30 pm
Admin @SharkSEO
@Sander That’s a fair point, I think for most sites (probably more commercial sites too) it’s more important to get those links, than an extra brand term listing – but you’re right, Wimbledon are probably not too concerned about their extra listing.
@Rob It’s a weird one this, it 301s to most people, but if you’re a search engine it shows you a 303. You can see it if you switch your user-agent to Googlebot.
@Richard & Scott – Thanks guys!
July 30, 2010 4:03 pm
Richard Vaughan @@richardtvaughan
Dave,
In live http headers I’ve got wimbledon.com 301ing to wimbledon.org which then in turn 303s to wimbledon.org/en_GB/index.html
Is that not what you are seeing?
So the 301 (wimbledon.com) is indexed and the 303 (wimbledon.org) is being treated more like a 302 rather than a 301!
All very strange.
Posting your comment...
Leave A Comment