http://sharkseo.com/wp-content/themes/press
Vince & The Related Searches

21 Oct 2009, Posted by admin in Featured,Google, 4 Comments

Vince & The Related Searches


A while ago I posted on the iCrossing Connect blog about Google’s Vince update, where I mentioned that the huge boost that a lot of brands saw could be attributed to what users were actually searching for. So if people search for “car insurance” and then search for “direct line”, and click on Direct Line’s homepage in the search results, Google might be more likely to place Direct Line within the search results for “car insurance”.

This idea fits in exactly with what Chewy from Google recently mentioned, where he suggested that users refining a query generally indicates that they’re not happy with what they’ve seen, and Google sees that as a failure. As Richard Baxter has pointed out before, Google might also want to make sure that they get it right the first time because each query refinement will cost them in bandwidth. Getting the query right means that their cost per query goes down. When you scale that to something the size of Google, that could potentially be an enormous saving.

Lastly, the Vince update appears to have been rolled out across search terms that have a very high search volume (like “car insurance”, “loans” etc), but I’m going to guess that Vince mainly applies to terms that are searched for a lot, but that also have a huge percentage of those queries that then get refined. Another reason that Google might do that is because they have no idea what to show people when they search for something as generic as “loans”. I wouldn’t know what to return to people either – are they looking for a loan? Looking for advice on taking out a loan? Do they want to lend money? Do they want a definition on a loan? Statistics on loans? Google isn’t sure either, so a benefit of Vince is that they can let users dictate what they want to see. If vastly more people want to see Money Supermarket and Tesco Finance instead of Wikipedia’s loans page – why not display them instead?

The interesting thing about Vince is that it looks like the related searches show the refined queries – so if people search for “car tax” after they search for “car insurance” – that’ll be shown in the related search. Last year the related searches only displayed semantically related terms (like if you’d put those terms into the Adwords Keyword tool). Now it doesn’t. Check it out:

unicorns

miserable-failure

Awesome.

Flickr image from Marc Shackman

Promote Post

Enjoyed this post?

4 Comments

October 21, 2009 9:56 am

Nina Greaves

We use Google Adwords and always test Google SERPS to keep up with the flow of traffic and sources – interesting information indeed thanks for posting it on Twitter

November 1, 2009 4:01 pm

Reading List #3 | SEO Scientist – Applying the scientific method to SEO

[...] trying to explain the nature of these algo changes. For additional reading on this topic, check out Shark SEO’s article on the same [...]

January 8, 2010 5:18 pm

richardbaxterseo

You’re 100% correct to bring attention to the “searches related to” box. There’s a lot of info given away in there, if you how to look.

I like this site design by the way!

October 11, 2012 11:45 pm

Alex

I know this post is ages old, but what can be done to remove terms like “scam” from the related search. I know G just finally removed that term from the auto suggest, but that is only partially helping people as the damage is still being done if found in suggest search. Any thoughts?

Posting your comment...

Leave A Comment


Subscribe to this comment via Email