<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Can Google Improve It&#8217;s Search Results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharkseo.com/google/improving-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharkseo.com/google/improving-google/</link>
	<description>Black, White, Grey. Whatever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle SEO</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/google/improving-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=405#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>Agree that Google focuses way too much on anchor text. However, this is primarily how their search engine was designed from the beginning as you can read in Sergey Brin&#039;s and Lawrence Page&#039;s Stanford University paper, The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
This paper is a must read for anyone involved in SEO, even though it&#039;s dated, the foundations pretty much remain the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that Google focuses way too much on anchor text. However, this is primarily how their search engine was designed from the beginning as you can read in Sergey Brin&#8217;s and Lawrence Page&#8217;s Stanford University paper, The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine <a href="http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html" rel="nofollow">http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html</a><br />
This paper is a must read for anyone involved in SEO, even though it&#8217;s dated, the foundations pretty much remain the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Waterfield</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/google/improving-google/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Waterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=405#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Yup - I did enjoy this post. 

While I need those links - I am not going to be creating the negative publicity to get them. 

I will just have to work on getting the links from like minded relevant sites and hope that this all helps in the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup &#8211; I did enjoy this post. </p>
<p>While I need those links &#8211; I am not going to be creating the negative publicity to get them. </p>
<p>I will just have to work on getting the links from like minded relevant sites and hope that this all helps in the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://sharkseo.com/google/improving-google/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkseo.com/?p=405#comment-951</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem with that, though, is that most people don’t link to things like that. We do as SEOs, of course, but there’s a significant amount of people that don’t. There’s a surprising amount of people that link with just the URL as the anchor text, and there’s still an unbelievable amount of links out there that say “click here”, “more info” and “find out more”.&quot;

I think they&#039;ve got that one down. Google looks at the neighbouring text as well, such that talking about backlinks near a link that says click here probably passes some value to the site for it to rank for &#039;backlinks&#039;. 

Thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem with that, though, is that most people don’t link to things like that. We do as SEOs, of course, but there’s a significant amount of people that don’t. There’s a surprising amount of people that link with just the URL as the anchor text, and there’s still an unbelievable amount of links out there that say “click here”, “more info” and “find out more”.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;ve got that one down. Google looks at the neighbouring text as well, such that talking about backlinks near a link that says click here probably passes some value to the site for it to rank for &#8216;backlinks&#8217;. </p>
<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.311 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
