Comments on: Getting Links From Google http://sharkseo.com/google/getting-links-from-google/ Black, White, Grey. Whatever. Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: admin http://sharkseo.com/google/getting-links-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1842 admin Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:03:12 +0000 http://sharkseo.com/?p=638#comment-1842 Hi Ell, It depends on what you're trying to do, but I'd be surprised if someone could come up with a solid, realistic SEO strategy and deliver accurate keyword research, raise (and help fix) technical issues and help build the right links to help drive results on only £50/month. I wouldn't recommend paying someone to become a certified SEO - it's not really how it works. If you wanted some verifiable proof that you knew what you were doing, the best thing would be to get some proof of results that you've delivered for clients or your own sites. Good luck. Hi Ell,

It depends on what you’re trying to do, but I’d be surprised if someone could come up with a solid, realistic SEO strategy and deliver accurate keyword research, raise (and help fix) technical issues and help build the right links to help drive results on only £50/month.

I wouldn’t recommend paying someone to become a certified SEO – it’s not really how it works. If you wanted some verifiable proof that you knew what you were doing, the best thing would be to get some proof of results that you’ve delivered for clients or your own sites. Good luck.

]]> By: Ell Henry http://sharkseo.com/google/getting-links-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1839 Ell Henry Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:51:10 +0000 http://sharkseo.com/?p=638#comment-1839 I may be 9 months late but it is worth a try, whom would pass a chance of getting link juice from google...I just found Shark SEO through twitter and thought I would see wha gwan. I also didn't know there were companies that charge £50 per month and less in some instances for seo in house..Do you think that SEO services like this do more harm then good or is it fair game.. also I was looking at getting being a certified SEO professional but some companies charge around £250 as a minumum for the test what is your opinion on certification and if you are pro certification whom would you recommend I may be 9 months late but it is worth a try, whom would pass a chance of getting link juice from google…I just found Shark SEO through twitter and thought I would see wha gwan. I also didn’t know there were companies that charge £50 per month and less in some instances for seo in house..Do you think that SEO services like this do more harm then good or is it fair game.. also I was looking at getting being a certified SEO professional but some companies charge around £250 as a minumum for the test what is your opinion on certification and if you are pro certification whom would you recommend

]]> By: admin http://sharkseo.com/google/getting-links-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1138 admin Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:06:25 +0000 http://sharkseo.com/?p=638#comment-1138 Cheers Malcolm, it's an interesting one. I can't see an immediate reason why the links wouldn't count, but then again it's possible that they've manually set it to not follow links that are clearly in their search results. If I was Google, that's probably what I'd do. Cheers Malcolm, it’s an interesting one. I can’t see an immediate reason why the links wouldn’t count, but then again it’s possible that they’ve manually set it to not follow links that are clearly in their search results. If I was Google, that’s probably what I’d do.

]]> By: malcolm coles http://sharkseo.com/google/getting-links-from-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1135 malcolm coles Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:20:49 +0000 http://sharkseo.com/?p=638#comment-1135 I remember reading some Googler saying they didn't count links from their own domain. Wonder if this was a blanket policy or based on robots.txt. Can't find the quote now, sorry. I remember reading some Googler saying they didn’t count links from their own domain. Wonder if this was a blanket policy or based on robots.txt. Can’t find the quote now, sorry.

]]>